5 research outputs found

    Object Composition Identification by Measurement of Local Radio Frequency Magnetic Fields with an Atomic Magnetometer

    No full text
    Proof of principle of object composition identification based on inductive measurements with an atomic magnetometer has been demonstrated in highly engineered laboratory conditions. Progress in the development of portable miniaturised magnetometers has encouraged on the parallel development of the measurement technologies involving this sensor, in particular concepts that would enable operation in complex test scenarios. Here, we explore the problem of material identification in the context of measurements performed with variable distance between the object and the primary radio-frequency field source and sensor. We identify various aspects of the measurement affected by variable distance and discuss possible solutions, based on the signal phase analysis, a combination of frequency and angular signal dependencies and the implementation of a pair of excitation coils

    Object Composition Identification by Measurement of Local Radio Frequency Magnetic Fields with an Atomic Magnetometer

    No full text
    Proof of principle of object composition identification based on inductive measurements with an atomic magnetometer has been demonstrated in highly engineered laboratory conditions. Progress in the development of portable miniaturised magnetometers has encouraged on the parallel development of the measurement technologies involving this sensor, in particular concepts that would enable operation in complex test scenarios. Here, we explore the problem of material identification in the context of measurements performed with variable distance between the object and the primary radio-frequency field source and sensor. We identify various aspects of the measurement affected by variable distance and discuss possible solutions, based on the signal phase analysis, a combination of frequency and angular signal dependencies and the implementation of a pair of excitation coils

    Demonstration of polycrystalline thin film coatings on glass for spin Seebeck energy harvesting - dataset

    No full text
    <div>Zip file with all raw XRD, XRR, transport data.</div>Origin project(s) containing raw and processed data for related publication.<div><br></div><div>Figure 1 was schematic only and not included here.</div><div>Figure 2 and Figure S2 are in the same origin project (simple and extended TEM data).</div><div><br></div><div>Figure captions:</div><div><p></p><p>Figure 2 TEM analysis of SSE5a. a) & b) STEM/BF and HAADF images of the thin film, respectively. c) Conventional HREM of the PM Pt layer. d) EDX line-scan performed perpendicular to the interfaces of the layers.</p><p></p><p>Figure 3 Summary of the magnetic, electric and thermal properties. a) Spin Seebeck voltage, <i>V<sub>ISHE</sub></i> (symbols), as a function of applied magnetic field plotted alongside magnetic data (line). b) Resistivity of the devices as a function of <i>t<sub>PM</sub></i>. c) Normalised spin Seebeck voltage, <i>S<sub>SSE</sub></i>, as a function of <i>t<sub>PM</sub></i>, plotted alongside simulated <i>S<sub>SSE</sub></i> (<i>θ<sub>SH</sub></i> = 0.1, <i>λ<sub>SD</sub></i> = 2 nm, <i>M<sub>s</sub></i> = 90 Am<sup>2</sup>/kg, D = 71x10<sup>41</sup> Jm<sup>2</sup>[19], <i>g<sub>r</sub></i> = 1,3 & 5x10<sup>18</sup> m<sup>-2</sup>[20]). d) Definition of the parameters used to describe heat flow, (e) & (f) Change in <i>ΔT<sub>2</sub></i>, and <i>S<sub>SSE</sub></i> with substrate's thermal conductivity, <i>κ<sub>3</sub></i>.</p><p>Figure S1 Characterisation of the Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> film. a) SQUID magnetometry above and below the Verwey transition, <i>T<sub>V</sub></i>. b) Resistivity as a function of temperature. c) XRD of a set of 4 separately prepared Fe<sub>3</sub>O<sub>4</sub> films. The inset shows a close-up of the (311), (222) peaks. d) Example XRR data (symbols) and fit (solid line), indicating thickness = 79 nm, roughness = 1.5 nm.</p><p></p><p>Figure S2 TEM analysis of SSE5a. a) & b) STEM/BF and HAADF images of the thin film, respectively. c) Conventional HREM of the PM Pt layer. d) & e) STEM/BF image of the thin film stack and corresponding EDX line-scan performed perpendicular to the interfaces of the layers, respectively, and f) schematic of the grain growth described in the text.</p><p></p><p>Figure S3 Characteristics of the bilayer film. a) XRD of SSE5a (2.5 nm Pt) and SSE20a (7.3 nm Pt). Inset shows a close-up of the Pt peak. b)  XRR fit of SSE5a; Pt thickness = 2.5 nm, roughness = 2 nm.</p><p></p><p>Figure S4 Example spin Seebeck measurement for SSE7a (<i>t<sub>PM</sub></i> = 3.2 nm) measured in fixed field as a function of temperature difference. Note that the sign convention for measurements, defined in Fig 1(a) of the main manuscript follows from Uchida <i>et al.</i>[6].</p></div
    corecore